Comité De Padres De Familia v. Honig
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, J.
Plaintiffs commenced an action against the State Department of Education (Department) and the State Board of Education (Board) for declaratory and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that defendants have a statutory duty to monitor and enforce compliance with affirmative action employment programs in local school districts and seek a. mandatory injunction compelling defendants to perform these duties. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs appeal from the ensuing judgment. We shall affirm.
In 1974 the Board adopted regulations…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Honey Springs Homeowners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Zetterberg v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- California Welfare Rights Organization v. CarlesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- California Welfare Rights Organization v. BrianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- State Board of Education v. HonigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. QuesadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Freedom Financial Thrift & Loan v. Golden Pacific BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- California Country Club Homes Ass'n, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.