Legal Opinion
Farley v. Watt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 16, 1933No. 23962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.
This is an original action, wherein Richard C. Farley seeks release fromi imprisonment which was occasioned by his alleged violation of ordinance No. 4402, Oklahoma City. That ordinance regulates hucksters, peddlers, and hawkers. It requires payment of a license fee or tax in the amount of $80 per annum, and provides a penalty for noncomplianee. No exception is contained in the ordinance.
The authority of municipal subdivisions of the state to levy and collect such fees or taxes is derived from the state. Section 20, art. 10, Constitution of Oklahoma; section 6389, O. S. 1931 (section 4556, C.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- In Re Gross Production Tax of Wolverine Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Eddy v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- People Ex Rel. Donovan v. Retirement Board of the Policemen's Annuity & Benefit FundIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
- Carlton v. BoudarSupreme Court of Virginia · 1916
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Larson v. City of SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATIONIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATIONIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Hanley v. STATE, DEPT. OF CONSERVATIONIndiana Supreme Court · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.