Legal Opinion
City of Drumright v. Strand Amusement Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 15, 1929No. 18193PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment holding void section 12 of ordinance No. 201, city of Drumright, and enjoining the enforcement thereof. Said section of said ordinance is as follows:
“Any person, firm or corporation, either as principal or agent, who shall own or manage any opera house, or picture show within the limits of the city of Drumright, shall pay a license therefor, the sum of $100 per year, payable in advance quarterly.’’
The judgment in effect holds that the municipality may not enforce the provisions of the occupation tax ordinance for the sole purpose of revenue. «That application…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ex Parte MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Ex Parte DickisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1876
- Chevrolet Motor Co. v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fox Bakersfield Theatre Corp. v. City of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- American Locker Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Crawford v. Town of MarshallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932