Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Marler
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 8, 1929No. 19849PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
Petitioner seeks release front imprisonment in the city jail in the city of Shawnee. His restraint is the result of his being charged and held in custody pending trial for having violated the provisions of ordinance No. 342, as amended by ordinance No. 365, and ordinance No. 424, of said city, which by article 6 thereof provides for á tax of $25 upon the occupation of a building contractor within said city, and by section 1 thereof prohibits any person from engaging in any occupation, etc., therein enumerated without having paid said city the license tax therein levied and without having…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Fort Smith v. ScruggsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- City of St. Louis v. SternbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- McGannon, Admx. v. State Ex Rel. TrappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- American Union Express Co. v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Apache Gas Products Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Helm v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Ex Parte SmallCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.