Russ Lumber & Mill Co. v. Garrettson
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
The plaintiff, a corporation, brought this action to foreclose a lien for materials furnished for and used in the erection of a building on land owned by defendant Garrettson.
It is alleged in the complaint that on the seventeenth day of February, 1888, defeudaiit Garrettson entered into a contract with defendants Wan berg & Nelson, whereby they agreed to erect and finish for him a building on a certain described piece of land; that on various occasions between the twenty-second day of February and the twentieth day of May, 1888, the plaintiff, at the instance and request of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tredinnick v. Red Cloud Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1887
- Jewell v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hills v. OhligCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Phelps v. Maxwell's Creek Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by11 opinions
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Yancy v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Green v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Curtis v. SestanovichOregon Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.