Legal Opinion

Schullman v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1963No. L. A. 26996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner, Alexander H. Schullman, aged 59, was admitted to practice law in this state in 1937. He was found guilty on three counts of professional misconduct, all of which relate to his acts in connection with money bor rowed from his clients (Mr. and Mrs. David Kaufman) and their efforts to obtain security for and repayment of the funds loaned. Although petitioner has failed to sustain his burden of showing lack of support for the recommendation of the Board of Governors of the State Bar that he be suspended from practice for a period of one year, we have concluded, for reasons…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Black v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Best v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Magee v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Rock v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Greenbaum v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Yapp v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API