Legal Opinion

Greenbaum v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1976No. L.A. 30459PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding to review a recommendation of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar of California (board) that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for three years, on conditions of probation and no actual suspension. The basis for the recommended discipline is that petitioner violated rule 9, Rules of Professional Conduct, in that he, without prior authorization, withdrew clients’ funds totalling $11,000 from trust accounts and appropriated them to his personal use.

The local administrative committee recommended a four-year suspension, on conditions of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bernstein v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Vaughn v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Clancy v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Alberton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Giovanazzi v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Northbay Wellness Group v. Michael BeyriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Hamilton v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Matter of BurtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API