Legal Opinion

Vincent v. Snoqualmie Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1894No. 878PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scott, J.

Two actions were begun in the superior court of King county, which were afterwards consolidated and tried together, and a single judgment rendered in both actions in favor of the plaintiffs. Certain of the defendants appealed. One was an action in which Nazaree Vincent was plaintiff, and was brought to foreclose a laborer’s lien for labor performed for the Snoqualmie Mill Company. The other action was brought by the Parke & Lacy Machinery Company to foreclose a certain mortgage covering both real and personal property, given to secure the sum…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Front Street Cable Railway Co. v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Nelson v. ClerfWashington Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. OppenheimerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Titlow v. MacPhailCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  3. Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co. v. Clear Lake Cedar Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Grinstead v. Union Savings & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1911
  5. Herrick v. First National BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API