Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Clerf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892No. 422PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court Kittitas County. Action by Nelson & Swanson, against Clerf, Kleinsmidt and the West Side Irrigating Company to foreclose a laborers’ lien upon a ditch, belonging to the irrigating company.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J. —

The principal defendant below, the West Side Irrigating Company, employed Clerf & Kleinsmidt to excavate an irrigating ditch twelve miles long over the lands of various owners. Clerf & Kleinsmidt sub-let to plaintiffs two miles of the work. Plaintiffs claimed performance of their sub-contract, and filed a mechanic’s lien upon the ditch, which they sought to foreclose by this action. The superior court dismissed the action for failure to show ownership or interest in the land over which the line of the ditch lay. All that appeared upon these…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northlake Concrete Products, Inc. v. WylieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. Vincent v. Snoqualmie Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Holm v. GilchristWashington Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API