Legal Opinion

Front Street Cable Railway Co. v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1891No. 89PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The decree from which this appeal was taken established' that the appellees were entitled to the foreclosure of their numerous liens upon the cable railway of the appellant on Front and other streets, in the city of Seattle, and the power-house connected with the railway, and the machinery connected with the poAver-house, and ordered the sale of the same or so much thereof as might be necessary to raise the amount due the appellees. The liens thus adjudicated had been filed against the railway, etc., for labor performed at the instance of a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Louisville & Portland Railroad v. Louisville City Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1865
  3. Kellogg v. Littell & Smythe Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Board of Railroad Commissioners v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1898
  4. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Vincent v. Snoqualmie Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API