Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Firestone Building Products

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1997No. CA 96-1119PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James R. Cooper, Judge.

The appellant in this workers’ compensation case filed a claim after he slipped and was injured while pulling extremely heavy sheets of rubber over rollers in the course of his employment with the appellee. The Commission denied the claim because it found no evidence to satisfy the “objective findings” requirement of Ark. Code Ann. § 11-9-102(5)(D) (Repl. 1996). For reversal, the appellant contends that the Commission erred in concluding that the medical evidence was not based on objective findings. We agree, and we reverse.

“Objective findings” are defined at Ark. Code…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  2. University of Arkansas Medical Sciences v. HartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Swift-Eckrich, Inc. v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  4. Continental Express, Inc. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. VanWagnerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API