Carlat v. Ark. Highway & Transp. Dep't
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtBrandon J. Harrison, Judge
This workers'-compensation appeal asks us to decide whether substantial evidence supports the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission's decision that an Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department employee's weed eating activities did not equate to a rapid-repetitive movement as workers'-compensation law uses the term.
Dale Carlat is a fifty-four-year-old man who has worked for the highway department since 2002. In October 2014, he complained of a sharp pain in his shoulder but did not report it as a work-related injury until March 2015. In February 2015 a MRI showed several tears and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jeter v. B.R. McGinty MechanicalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Malone v. Texarkana Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Boyd v. Dana Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
- Lay v. United Parcel ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.