Simpson v. Wilson
District Court, D. Vermont
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
COFFRIN, District Judge.
Introduction
Plaintiffs in this action challenge provisions of the Vermont Welfare Assistance Manual (WAM) that prohibit payment of Medicaid funds for glasses and physician services needed to correct plaintiffs’ visual refractive error. Subsequent to our order certifying this suit as a class action, the parties submitted a Stipulation of Facts and affidavits. The court now has before it the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment; we rule in favor of the plaintiffs.
Facts
This case arises out of Vermont’s participation, through its Department of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Beal v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Preterm, Inc. v. Michael S. Dukakis, Parents' Aid Society, Inc. v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Parents' Aid Society, Inc. v. Alexander E. Sharp IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- White v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hern v. BeyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Hern v. BeyeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Ohlson v. WeilColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Smith v. PalmerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1998
- Jacobus v. Department of PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.