Legal Opinion

Ohlson v. Weil

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 1997No. 96CA0395PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge CASEBOLT.

In this action concerning coverage under the Colorado Medical Assistance Act (Medicaid), plaintiff, Brenda Ohlson, appeals the district court’s order in favor of defendants, Colorado Department of Health Care Policy and Financing (Department), and its executive director, Alan Weil, which upheld a determination by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that Ohlson’s medically necessary body brace was not a covered expense. We reverse and remand with directions.

Ohlson, who is 35 years old, suffers from spinal muscular dystrophy and is wheelchair-bound. She requires a molded…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alexander v. ChoateSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Curtis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. M.S. v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Sobky v. SmoleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
  5. White v. BealCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stell v. BOULDER COUNTY DEPT. OF SOC. SERV.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment v. BethellColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Sanders ex rel. Rayl v. Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  4. Callen v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Denver Local 2-477, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers' International Union v. Metro Wastewater Reclamation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API