Legal Opinion
White v. Beal
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 5, 1977No. 76-1755PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In administering its federally aided medical assistance program, Pennsylvania chose to limit its expenditures for eyeglasses by making them available on the basis of etiology rather than medical necessity. The district court determined that the classification was in conflict with the underlying federal statute, and enjoined application of the restrictive state regulations. We affirm.
The plaintiff class is composed of individuals generally qualifying for benefits under Pennsylvania’s medical assistance program established under Title XIX of the Social…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oneida Indian Nation v. County of OneidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jefferson v. HackneySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mathews v. De CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Preterm, Inc. v. Michael S. Dukakis, Parents' Aid Society, Inc. v. Alexander E. Sharp Ii, Parents' Aid Society, Inc. v. Alexander E. Sharp IICourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Curtis v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Rodriguez v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sobky v. SmoleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1994
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.