Fredericks v. Fredericks
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Sandstrom, Justice.
[¶1] Lyndon Fredericks appeals, and Bole Resources, LLC, and others (“Bole defendants”) cross-appeal from a judgment declaring the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction over the action, reforming a quit claim mineral deed, quieting title in the mineral interests in Paul Freder-icks, and ordering Lyndon Fredericks to pay the Bole defendants damages plus interest and their attorney fees. Because we conclude the district court correctly ruled it had subject-matter jurisdiction, its findings of fact are not clearly erroneous, and it. did not abuse its discretion, we…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes & Bands of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of FroemkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Gustafson v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Motter v. Traill Rural Water DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Northwest Grading, Inc. v. North Star Water, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Hoff v. City of BurlingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.