Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Poitra

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 2018No. 20170423PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEvers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Raymond and Linus Poitra appeal from a judgment quieting title in two parcels of land on the Turtle Mountain Indian Reservation in Darrel Gustafson and ordering the Poitras to pay Gustafson $67,567.98 in damages and $6,620 in attorney's fees. The Poitras argue the district court erred in deciding the Turtle Mountain Tribal Court did not have jurisdiction over Gustafson's action. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2015, Gustafson sued the Poitras and all others claiming an interest in two parcels of land, alleging Gustafson was a non-Indian fee owner of the two parcels located in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. American Surety Co. v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trenton Indian Housing Authority v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Beth Eva Smith v. Stephen E LandrumMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Gustafson v. PoitraNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Procive v. WSINorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Wardner v. Porath, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API