Motter v. Traill Rural Water District
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶ 1] Traill Rural Water District (“TRWD”) appeals from a judgment granting damages for overdue rent to Daniel and Marlene- Motter (“the Motters”). We conclude the district court did not err in denying reformation of two leases on the Motters’ land and did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. We affirm the district court’s judgment.
I
[¶ 2] In 2006 Melba Motter, through her estate’s conservator Alerus Financial, leased approximately forty acres of land in rural Steele County to TRWD at $250 per acre for ninety-nine years. Attorneys for both Melba Motter’s estate…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Hartleib v. SimesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Hamre v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fettig v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Motter v. Traill Rural Water DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Vormestrand v. Craig, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026