Legal Opinion

Motter v. Traill Rural Water District

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2017No. 20170122PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crothers, Justice.

[¶ 1] Traill Rural Water District (“TRWD”) appeals from a judgment granting damages for overdue rent to Daniel and Marlene- Motter (“the Motters”). We conclude the district court did not err in denying reformation of two leases on the Motters’ land and did not abuse its discretion in granting a new trial. We affirm the district court’s judgment.

I

[¶ 2] In 2006 Melba Motter, through her estate’s conservator Alerus Financial, leased approximately forty acres of land in rural Steele County to TRWD at $250 per acre for ninety-nine years. Attorneys for both Melba Motter’s estate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Okken v. OkkenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ell v. EllNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Johnson v. HovlandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hartleib v. SimesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Hamre v. SengerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fettig v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Motter v. Traill Rural Water DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Schindler v. WagemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Vormestrand v. Craig, et al.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API