Legal Opinion

Frigidaire Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1929No. Docket No. 7093PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

While standing on the open platform of the railroad station at Reno, Nevada, awaiting the arrival of a train which he was about to board for San Francisco, Elmer Melke was struck and mortally wounded by a stray bullet fired by a police officer at a suspected criminal whom the officer was pursuing along the public street adjacent to the railroad station; and on account of Melke’s death his widow and son were awarded compensation by the Industrial Accident Commission. Thereafter his employer Frigidaire Corporation and its insurance carrier Royal Indemnity Company instituted this proceeding in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Claim of Katz v. A. Kadans & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Larson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mahowald v. Thompson-Starrett Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Alger v. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of San Bernardino v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Madin v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. C. A. Dunham Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
  5. Potter v. Realty Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API