Legal Opinion

Morgan v. Industrial Commission of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1937No. 5828PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLAND, Chief Justice.

From a decision of the Industrial Commission of Utah denying compensation, plaintiff brought certiorari. The only question presented is whether, under the undisputed facts, plaintiff’s accidental injury arose out of or in the course of employment. We conclude it did, and the decision of the Industrial Commission must be reversed.

Samuel Morgan, plaintiff, is and was the principal of the Davis County High School at Kaysville. On Sunday, February 2, 1936, at about 10' o’clock p. m., he was struck by an automobile and severely injured while walking on the public highway…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Claim of Dependents of Marks v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Matter of Schwimmer v. Kammerman KaminskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  5. Kahn Bros. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Rowan Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  2. M & K Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cavness v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Pérez v. Comisión IndustrialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  5. Vitagraph, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API