Legal Opinion

Schubert v. Target Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 2, 2010No. 10-349PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.

liAppellant Roger Schubert appeals the order of the Pulaski County Circuit Court directing a verdict in favor of Appellee Target Stores, Inc. On appeal, Schubert asserts that the circuit court erred in determining that there was not sufficient evidence to submit to the jury the issue of whether Target’s negligence caused Schubert’s injuries. As this is a subsequent appeal, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup.Ct. R. 1 — 2(a)(7) (2010). We find no error and affirm.

Only a brief recitation of the facts is necessary, as the pertinent facts were set forth in Schubert…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Cadillac Cowboy, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Barker v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Mangrum v. PigueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Melanie Jones v. WellPath, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  2. Dupont v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Johnson v. M.S. Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Sammons v. SEECO, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
  5. Johnson v. Windstream Commc'ns, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API