Legal Opinion
Barker v. Clark
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 30, 2000No. 00-424PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. Corbin, Justice.
Appellant Ronnie Barker and Appellee Charles Clark both petition this court for review from a 4-2 decision by the Arkansas Court of Appeals. In Barker v. Clark, 69 Ark. App. 375, 13 S.W.3d 190 (2000), the court of appeals affirmed the decision of the Faulkner County Circuit Court limiting discovery on the issues of Appellee’s driving record and liability insurance, but reversing the trial court’s denial of a jury instruction on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur and remanding the matter for a new trial. Our jurisdiction of this matter is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Edwards v. StillsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- National Bank of Commerce v. QuirkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Kail v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Donna Kudabeck, Steven Kudabeck v. The Kroger Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Madden v. AldrichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Mangrum v. PigueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Maddox v. City of Fort SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.