Legal Opinion
Mangrum v. Pigue
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 11, 2004No. 03-853PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Betty C. Dickey, Chief Justice.
Bryan Mangrum alleges the damage to his corn crop was caused by appellees Ronald Pigue Sr., Ronald Pigue Jr., Marshal Flying Service, and Ron Moss. The trial judge granted appellees’ motion for directed verdict, ruling as a matter of law, that the activity was not ultrahazardous, and ruling also that there was insufficient evidence to submit the issue of negligence to the jury. We affirm.
Facts
On February 14, 2001, Mangrum filed a complaint alleging Ron Moss, flying for Marshall’s Flying Service, had negligently sprayed an ultrahazardous chemical, Roundup Ultra,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- City of Caddo Valley v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. KeltonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
- Glidewell, Admin. v. Arkhola Sand Gravel Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
- Conagra, Inc. v. StrotherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Mankey v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Raeburn Bedford v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Moss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Sykes v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- Switzer v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.