Woods v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor and their punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of ninety days for each of them.
The defendants contend that the search warrant was void, and that therefore the evidence secured thereunder was inadmissible. The search warrant was particularly objected to, in that it did not run in the name of the state of Oklahoma. That part of the search warrant pertinent to this case reads as follows:
“State…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- McAdoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- Sloan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ex Parte StephensonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1949
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Eslick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940