Sloan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 6 months.
The defendant contends that the search warrant was void, and that therefore the evidence secured thereunder was inadmissible; the particular objection to the search warrant being that it did not run in the name of the state of Oklahoma.
Article 7, § 19, of the Constitution of Oklahoma provides:
“The style of all writs and processes shall be ‘The State…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
- McAdoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laub v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
- Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
- Jean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932