Legal Opinion

Sloan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 23, 1929No. A-6811PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Oklahoma county on a charge of manufacturing whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 6 months.

The defendant contends that the search warrant was void, and that therefore the evidence secured thereunder was inadmissible; the particular objection to the search warrant being that it did not run in the name of the state of Oklahoma.

Article 7, § 19, of the Constitution of Oklahoma provides:

“The style of all writs and processes shall be ‘The State…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. McAdoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Laub v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Murray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Jean v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API