Legal Opinion

People v. Gans

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Benjamin Altman, J.

Can a certified social worker be qualified as an expert to testify as to defendant’s mental capacity to proceed and defendant’s competency in the foreseeable future?

A motion to grant relief to the above-captioned defendant pursuant to the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Jackson v Indiana (406 US 715) was filed with this court, alleging that this defendant is an incapacitated defendant who cannot reasonably be expected to attain fitness to proceed in the foreseeable future. A hearing was directed for the purpose of allowing the defendant and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Matter of Torsney (Mental Hygiene)New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. Valentino, New York County Courts1974
  4. People v. Acevedo, New York County Courts1975
  5. People v. BurgessNew York Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of AsWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. A.S.Washington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. ChristopherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Karasek v. LaJoieNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. ScalaNew York Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API