Legal Opinion
Brazier v. Betts
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1941No. 28287PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Royal L. Brazier, by his guardian ad litem, instituted this action against Weston J. Betts and Lauree E. Betts, his wife, and Aubrey King and Mrs. King, alleging that, during the month of March, 1939, while he was lawfully on the premises of de fendants Betts, the defendant Aubrey King, while in the discharge of his duties as agent and employee of Mr. Betts, assaulted plaintiff by shooting him through both legs, inflicting serious injuries. Plaintiff alleged that the assault was unjustified, and asked for damages for injuries and expenses in a large sum. Defendants King were never served with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Matsuda v. HammondWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- McQueen v. People's Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Johanson v. Pioneer Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Poundstone v. WhitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- De Leon v. Doyhof Fish Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hunter v. BD. OF EDUC., MONT. CNTY.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Kuehn v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- Mason v. Kenyon Zero StorageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Whetzel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Paulyne B. McCall as the Administratrix of the Estate of Virgil C. McCall Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.