Legal Opinion

Poundstone v. Whitney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1937No. 25934. En BancPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This case presents four separate actions for damages resulting from an automobile collision. The four actions were consolidated for trial and are so treated upon the appeal. Prior to the time of trial, defendant Claude Lynch defaulted. Thereafter, the court, trying the case without'a jury, made findings and conclusions, based upon which judgments were rendered for the respective plaintiffs against all the defendants. Later, the judgments were vacated as to the defendant Willard Westmoreland. The defendants Whitney and wife, only, have appealed from each of the judgments so entered.

The crucial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moon v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Luckett v. ReighardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  3. Loux v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McQueen v. People's Store Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Carmin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. McNew v. Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brazier v. BettsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Smith v. Eldridge Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Schosboek v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1937

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API