State ex rel. J. D. Matheson & Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Florida
This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the court. Motion for peremptory writ.
1Opinion of the Court
Raney, C. J.:
The alternative writ shows that relators are the owners of a judgment rendered in the “county court” of Alachua county for $96.54 against Thomas Little and Arthur Simmons, and that on September 30th, 1884, they took out a writ of garnishment thereon against the trustees of the Union Academy, and the trustees acknowledged an indebtedness to defendants, and the judgment defendants moved the “county court” to dismiss “the case and the garnishment proceedings,” and on December 8th, 1884, it dismissed said proceedings; and that two days after relators perfected their appeal to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. BoutwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Secretary v. McGarrahanSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Thompson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. LuchsSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Ex Parte MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Palmer v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Dillman v. TedderSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- State ex rel. Sanchez v. CallSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- State ex rel. Floral City Phosphate Co. v. HockerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
- State ex rel. McKinnon v. WolfeSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.