Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Floral City Phosphate Co. v. Hocker

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the

1Opinion of the Court

Raney, C. J.:

This is a case of prohibition. The suggestion shows that the First Rational Bank of Ocala began an action in the Circuit Court in Marion county, which is 'in the Fifth Circuit, against the Floral City Phosphate Company, a body corporate under the laws of Florida, and W. M. Brooks and George C. Stevens, on a written instrument for the payment of money made by the Floral City Phosphate Company in favor of the named bank and endorsed by the other defendants; such instrument appearing to have been made and being payable at Ocala, which is in Marion county. The declaration was filed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bucki v. ConeSupreme Court of Florida · 1889
  2. Ex Parte GordonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Sherlock v. MayorSupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  4. Russ v. MitchellSupreme Court of Florida · 1865
  5. Ex Parte Baltimore & Ohio Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Curtis v. Albritton as Cir. JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Reynolds v. WhiteSupreme Court of Florida · 1898
  3. Crill v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1928
  4. State Ex Rel. Cacciatore v. DrumbrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Wright v. WorthSupreme Court of Florida · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API