Legal Opinion

Sage v. Broadcasting Publications, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 10, 1998No. Civil Action 86-1362 SSHPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.

Before the Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs opposition thereto, and defendants’ reply. Upon careful consideration of the entire record, defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted in part, and denied in part. Although findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary in ruling on a summary judgment motion, the Court nonetheless sets forth its analysis. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

Background

In 1981, defendants Broadcasting Publications, Inc. (“Broadcasting”), and Kirlin Enterprises, Inc. (“Kirlin”), along with five…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v. Chatelain, Samperton & NolanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bryant v. BrownleeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Mokhtar v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. United States v. Toyobo Co. LtdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. Roberson v. SnowDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API