Legal Opinion
Timken U.S. Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided March 5, 2004No. 00-00454PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiffs, Timken U.S. Corporation 1 (“Timken”) and Timken Nadellager, GmbH 2 (“TNG”), move pursuant to US-CIT R. 56.2 for judgment upon the agency record challenging one aspect of the United States Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) determination entitled Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews and Revocation of Orders in Part on Antifriction Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller Bearings) and Parts Thereof From France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Romania, Singapore, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (“Final Results”), 65 Fed.Reg. 49,219 (Aug. 11,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Smith-Corona Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- NTN Bearing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Chaparral Steel Company v. The United States, and Norsk Jernverk A.S.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Timken U.S. Corporation and Timken Nadellager, Gmbh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Fischer S.A. Comercio, Industria & Agricultura v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Yantai Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Yantai Timken Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
- Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.