Legal Opinion

Timken U.S. Corporation and Timken Nadellager, Gmbh v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 10, 2006No. 05-1158PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Chief Judge.

Timken U.S. Corporation and Timken Nadellager, GmbH (collectively “Timken”) appeal the United States Court of. International Trade’s decision upholding the United States Department of Commerce’s antidumping duty determination and Commerce’s refusal to correct certain alleged errors associated with Timken’s home market sales that were relied upon by Commerce in computing the dumping margin for Timken’s cylindrical roller bearings exported from Germany to the United States from May 1, 1998 to April 30, 1999. Timken v. United States, No. 00-09-00454, 2004 WL 2423732 (Ct.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. NTN Bearing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  4. Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2004
  5. Alloy Piping Products, Inc. v. Kanzen Tetsu Sdn. Bhd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. NMB Singapore Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  2. Pakfood Public Co. Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
  3. Grobest & I-Mei Industrial (Vietnam) Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012
  4. Ningbo Dafa Chemical Fiber Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Papierfabrik August Koehler Se v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API