Hall v. C & a Navarra Ranch, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TAYLOR (WARREN), J. *
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants after a finding by the trial court that no triable issue of fact existed.
I
The declarations, answers to interrogatories and admissions of the parties disclose the following facts.
Early in 1967, plaintiff, a beekeeper, moved 265 colonies of bees into defendants’ almond orchard, at defendants’ request, for the purpose of pollinizing the orchard. About a month later, plaintiff discovered that many of his bees had been killed. Investigation disclosed that they had been killed by a recent application of parathion,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- R. D. Reeder Lathing Co. v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Epstein v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Wilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
3Cited by3 opinions
- Holden v. ChunestudeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980