Wilson v. Board of Retirement of Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Appellant here complains of an order denying his motion to strike a cost bill filed in the court below by respondent county of Los Angeles following our affirmance of a judgment in favor of the county from which appellant had taken an unsuccessful appeal. (Wilson v. Board of Re tirement, 167 Cal.App.2d 229 [334 P.2d 230].) The remittitur provides that respondent recover its costs on appeal. The items here in controversy (the only costs claimed in said bill) cover the costs of preparing respondent’s brief and its answer to appellant’s petition for a hearing in the Supreme Court on the former…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Gage v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Goldsmith v. Board of Education of Sacramento City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Moss v. Underwriters' Report, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Uhl v. BadaraccoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Oakes v. McCarthy Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Bank of Idaho v. Pine Avenue AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- County of Los Angeles v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Bach v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Sequoia Vacuum Systems v. StranskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.