Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1980No. Civ. 57520Published

1Dissent

SCHWARTZ, J.*

I dissent. To distinguish a “commercial” weighing or measuring device from a “non-commercial” device, it is necessary to look to what use the device is put. Plaintiff’s scales are used for the following purposes: (a) Use by USPS to compute postal charges; (b) use by customers of USPS to compute the postal charges; (c) use by customers of UPS to compute parcel delivery charges; (d) use by parcel delivery services other than USPS and UPS to compute delivery charges; or (e) use by customers of parcel delivery services other than USPS and UPS to compute parcel delivery charges. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Adair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Marin County Board of Realtors, Inc. v. PalssonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Messner v. Journeymen Barbers, Hairdressers & Cosmetologists, International Union of America, Local 256California Supreme Court · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API