In Re Martin

BRITT, Judge.

Appellant contends that the District Court committed prejudicial and reversible error (1) in making “a finding of truancy where there is no evidence in the record to indicate that the truancy was willful or intentional,” and (2) committing Peggy to the Department of Juvenile Corrections without privilege of bond pending disposition of her case on appeal.(1) The record does not disclose that the court made a finding of truancy but the court did find, in effect, that Peggy was beyond the disciplinary control of her parents or custodian and was, therefore, a delinquent child in need…