Legal Opinion

State v. Rush

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 23, 1972No. 7218DC139PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Appellant’s first assignment of error alleging that G.S. 7A-278 is unconstitutional was not brought forward and argued in his brief and is thus deemed abandoned. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

Appellant questions the finding by the court that his statement to the police officer was voluntarily given and admissible into evidence. Though juvenile proceedings in this State are not criminal prosecutions and a finding of delinquency in a juvenile hearing is not synonymous with the conviction of a crime, a juvenile is entitled to certain…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BishopSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re G.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. In Re PottsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. In re ByersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API