Legal Opinion

State v. Bradsher

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 8, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOR, J.

Defendants, by their exception to the judgment herein rendered, present to this Court, for review, their contention that said judgment is erroneous, for that (1) the bail bond upon which it was rendered was not taken in open court; (2) the same was not signed by T. C. Bradsher, the principal; and (3) the appellants, R. M. Spencer and R. W. Wilkerson, signed the same upon conditions which were not complied with; and the appellant, W. J. Pettigrew, signed same in reliance upon the validity of the signatures of R. M. Spencer and R. W. Wilkerson. His Honor found the facts to be as contended by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. Morgan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. State v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. W. A. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. State v. . JakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MallorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. DewSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. In Re FergusonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. In Re MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API