State v. GARCIA-NAVARRO
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 The state appeals from the trial court’s order granting appellee Fabian Garcia-Navarro’s motion to suppress evidence, contending the court erred in finding that a citizen’s arrest statute did not authorize a border patrol agent to detain Gareia-Navarro. The state also claims that even if the border patrol agent was not permitted to make a citizen’s arrest, suppression was nevertheless an inappropriate remedy. Finding no error, we affirm the trial court’s decision.
Facts and Procedural History
¶ 2 In reviewing the grant of a motion to suppress, we view the evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. EstradaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. HackmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. Vargas-BurgosCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito EstrellaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Xavier Hipolito EstrellaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012