Legal Opinion
State v. Estrada
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 4, 2004No. 2 CA-CR 2003-0302PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLÓREZ, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 Appellee Francisco Estrada was charged with multiple counts of driving under the influence (DUI) of intoxicating liquor or drugs and one count of reckless manslaughter, arising out of a motor vehicle accident. The trial court granted Estrada’s motion to suppress blood-alcohol-concentration (BAC) test results of a blood sample taken from him without a warrant at the hospital after the accident. The state then filed a motion to dismiss the charges, which the trial court granted. The state subsequently filed this appeal, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-4032(6). See…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Karyn Rene Walther, United States of America v. Graciela Barba-BarbaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Thurman Reed, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. GerlaughArizona Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. OlquinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State of Arizona v. Patricia A. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. PeltzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. David James YonkmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.