Legal Opinion
California Car Wash Systems, Inc. v. Danco, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 4, 1972No. Civ. A. C-2299PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
CHILSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court after trial to the Court. The parties have submitted briefs which supplement their closing arguments.
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants from infringing Claims, 1, 2, 4, and 6 of Fuhring U. S. Patent No. 3,304,565. (See Exhibits 1 and QQ).
The Fuhring Patent for a roll-over car wash device was issued on February 21, 1967, to Heinrich Fuhring, and assigned to Bowe, Bohler, & Weber (Bowe). On January 1, 1970, Bowe granted a license under the patent to California Car Wash. On December 1, 1970,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Admiral Corporation v. Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Application of Charles Curtis SimmonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
- Griswold v. Oil Capital Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Nicholas Straussler v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boston Scientific Corp. v. MICRUS CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- California Car Wash Systems, Inc. v. Danco, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
- Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1981