California Car Wash Systems, Inc. v. Danco, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
CHILSON, District Judge.
After a trial to the Court, the Court entered Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Orders. (See 348 F.Supp. 958). Upon appeal by both parties of portions of the Court’s judgments, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this Court’s judgments in part, but reversed the Court’s judgment based on findings and conclusions that the patent under which the plaintiffs’ claim was anticipated by the prior act and therefore plaintiffs could not maintain their action for infringement. The matter was remanded to this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Griswold v. Oil Capital Valve Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Schram Glass Mfg. Co. v. Homer Brooke Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1918
- A. E. Staley Manufacturing Company v. Harvest Brand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- California Car Wash Systems, Inc. v. Danco, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1972
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wells Mfg. Corp., a Wisconsin Corporation v. Littelfuse, Inc., a Texas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976