Legal Opinion

Polaroid Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided July 10, 1981No. Civ. A. 76-1634-ZPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ZOBEL, District Judge.

In this action Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”) contends that Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) has infringed twelve patents issued to Polaroid. All of the patents in suit relate to the process known as “instant photography”. Kodak has denied infringement and has alleged that all of the patents are invalid or unenforceable. The case is before me on Kodak’s motion for partial summary judgment with respect to Polaroid’s U.S. Patent No. 3,761,269 (“269”). Kodak asserts that the ’269 patent is invalid as a matter of law because it was issued in violation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Delong Corporation v. Raymond International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  4. Mandel Brothers, Inc. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Morris Philip v. Mayer, Rothkopf Industries, Inc. And Mayer & Cie, Gmbh & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Micron Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API