State v. Bennett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
Defendant brings forward five assignments of error. Only the fifth merits discussion. It raises the question whether the second count in the bill of indictment states facts sufficient to charge defendant with the commission of a crime. Specifically, the inquiry is: In a count charging the sale of narcotics must the indictment allege the name of the purchaser?
The rule is stated in State v. Bissette, 250 N.C. 514, 517-18, 108 S.E. 2d 858, 861: “Where a sale is prohibited, it is necessary, for a conviction, to allege in the bill of indictment the name of the person to whom the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. BissetteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State v. . StameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. FlanneryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. IngramCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. LorenzoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.