State v. Bissette
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Art. I, sec. 12 of our Constitution requires a bill of indictment, unless waived, for all criminal actions originating in the Superior Court, and a valid bill is necessary to vest./the court with authority to determine the question of guilt or innocence. S. v. Helms, 247 N.C. 740, 102 S.E. 2d 243; S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166.
What are the essentials for a valid bill of indictment? Parker, J., *516gave a clear and concise answer to this question in S. v. Greer, 238 N.C. 325, 77 S.E. 2d 917. He said: “The authorities are in unison that an indictment, whether at common law or under a…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.