Legal Opinion

State v. Bissette

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1959No. 650PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Art. I, sec. 12 of our Constitution requires a bill of indictment, unless waived, for all criminal actions originating in the Superior Court, and a valid bill is necessary to vest./the court with authority to determine the question of guilt or innocence. S. v. Helms, 247 N.C. 740, 102 S.E. 2d 243; S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166.

What are the essentials for a valid bill of indictment? Parker, J., *516gave a clear and concise answer to this question in S. v. Greer, 238 N.C. 325, 77 S.E. 2d 917. He said: “The authorities are in unison that an indictment, whether at common law or under a…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. State v. . DowdySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. State v. NugentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. State v. HelmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. YoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. RaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API