Legal Opinion

Tehan v. United States Ex Rel. Shott

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 15, 1965No. 52PublishedCited by 737 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

In 1964 the Court held that the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against compulsory self-incrimination “is also protected by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by the States.” Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U. S. 1, 6. In Griffin v. California, decided on April 28, 1965, the Court held that adverse comment by a prosecutor or trial judge upon a defendant’s failure to testify in a state criminal trial violates the federal privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, because such comment “cuts down on the privilege by making its assertion costly.” 380 U. S. 609, 614. The question before us now is…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by737 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hellard v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Carter v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969

732 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API