Husch v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSomerville, J.
Several witnesses testified that the deceased stated just bfefore he made the written statement which was received in evidence as his dying declaration that he was going to die, and the declaration itself was prefaced by the statement that he believed it to be his dying statement- . On this predicate the statement was properly admitted as a dying declaration. 14 Michie’s Digest, 114, § 182.
The trial court admitted in evidence, ■over defendant’s objection, the shirt, trousers, and belt worn by deceased at the time he was killed. Such articles should' never be offered or received in evidence…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rollings v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Carwile v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
- Justice v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
- Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Stephens v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- Ex Parte PateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Kabase v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1943
- Sneed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.