Ex Parte Pate
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
We granted certiorari to review the question whether or when the defendant in a criminal case is entitled to inspection of a statement of a prosecution witness for the purpose of cross-examining or impeaching the witness.
Specifically involved are statements authenticated by rape victims.
The Court of Criminal Appeals, 415 So.2d 1131, found that "[t]hese statements were not used by the victims to refresh their recollections while they were on the witness stand," and concluded that "[t]he trial court correctly ruled that defense counsel was not entitled to inspect and use the statements." The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Slinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Mabry v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte MarekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte MorrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.