Legal Opinion

Bank of Nevada v. Friedman

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1966No. 5087PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court, Thompson, J.:

The main issue on this appeal is whether a resident defendant’s temporary absence from Nevada tolls the running of the statute of limitations against a cause of action on a promissory note if service of process could have been effected, during the period of such temporary absence, by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at the defendant’s dwelling house or usual place of abode with a person of suitable age and discretion residing there. Subordinate questions are also involved. The lower court ruled that the running of the statute was not tolled and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Clegg v. BishopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  2. Dredge Corporation v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bomud Co. v. Yockey Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  4. Paine v. DoddsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
  5. George Dedmon v. Falls Products IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. BealSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  2. Tarter v. InscoWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Defenders' Townhouse, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Valley Bank v. LarsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API